CAN ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES NOT APPLY LEGAL RULES FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS?

Abstract

Just as criteria have been generated that have strengthened the protection of human rights, there are
others that generate issues to be discussed in terms of their content and that would lead to the need
to express considerations to them in order to point out the notorious situation of inoperability of the
sustained criterion. In such a way that in order to delve into the proposed subject, we need to have
the support of some exact and specific points that can illustrate us mostly and conclude on the origin
or not of such criteria of our High Court. If the administrative authorities did not make proceedings of
any kind, let alone issue administrative or definitive acts of procedure that could affect human rights,
and without actually complying with the constitutional obligations imposed on them by the first three
paragraphs of the first constitutional article in relation to the Inter-American Convention on Human
Rights, the individual would always have to wait for a judge to determine inapplicability, and in the
meantime, his human rights would be being violated, over time that would possibly affect him in his
economy or other similar aspects, concluding that the administrative authority if he is obliged to
perform the Ex Officio conventionality.